Do you want to quit photography? Is photography dead?

Leica CL 23 F2 Summicron, Photography is dead? | Kyoto, Japan

Most of my friends have quit photography altogether. Some citing the lack of purpose and the pointlessness of sharing in the Era of AI. Links about AI were sent flying on our Whatapp channel. Yes I have seen the output, i see no threats whatsoever coming from images cooked up from learning from actual public photographs.

A scene flashed before my mind, I recalled when I first started photography and I bought a magazine, Digital SLR Magazine or something like that with promises of tutorials in getting better photographs at the cover of the magazine. I recall vividly that I read a page in there of how one can use Photoshop to remove a twig that was behind the photo of a lady captured by the camera. Poof! The twig goes missing and the photo was “strengthened”. I could recall clearly how I felt back then, “This is not photography, if you can remove or add things, what is the point of it”.

Leica CL + TT Artisan 50 1.2 | Is photography dead | Should I quit? | Kyoto, Japan

I consulted some veteran in the industry and they said its normal and ok to do it. It never got passed me, I seared my conscience year after year as I polish my portrait skills and doing all kinds of editing to please the model friends, before the word “influencers” even exist, these are just visually interesting people that are great to shoot at, but more importantly the forging of friendship with some of them has been a gem in this journey.

I never liked photoshop and opted only to use Lightroom. Editing WB, tones and fixing distortion slips thru my judgemental mirror easily, whatever shine remains on it. As time goes by I went to a gazillion of gears, funded by my business success. Photography is a safe hobby, I told myself. I seen ill fated businessmen destroy their families and relationships and all the money in the world ain’t gonna fix the damages. Womanizing, gambling and alchohol, these are really bad hobbies.

GAS, GAS, GAS

Sony RX1 | Is photography dead | Should I quit?

The pursuit of acquiring new gear in the belief that it will bring a tangible difference is often a hollow chase. While shopping can momentarily serve as therapy, its allure quickly dissipates upon unboxing. Some photographers, seeking meaning in their new acquisitions, create rituals such as crafting an album or engaging a model for a shoot. Yet even these acts often only serve as fleeting escapes before one is drawn back into the relentless cycle of desire and acquisition.

In the relentless pursuit of photographic mastery, I stand as both a cautionary figure and a paradoxical victor, ensnared by the allure of acquisition. Whether claimed victim or delusional conqueror, I have sought and owned many a unique and desirable camera, only to realize that possession itself is but a fleeting triumph in an endless quest for something ever elusive.

Canon R5 + Contarex Bulls Eye, Zeiss 50 F2 Planar | Is photography dead | Should I quit?

Can one fault an artist for cherishing their instruments? The joy found in acquiring and utilizing them is a sublime experience, akin to a melody that resonates with the soul. Yet, the siren song of the next camera, promising purpose and meaning, is a tantalizing lure, perpetually beckoning, always hinting at something greater, yet remaining ever elusive. In laymen term, I knew what I was getting into, yet I believe years of evolving experience and wisdom gained would entitled me to to choose the right gear that I would be 100% happy with.

Leica M9 | CCD Magic, God bless Prosophos soul

2023

As the year 2023 unfolds, I find myself triumphant over the insatiable ghost of Gear Acquisition Syndrome (GAS), having sacrificed myriad tools in allegiance to Sony A7SIII, Pentax 645Z, and Leica CL. Through countless family images and over ninety model collaborations, my portrait pursuits have evolved, yet they remain unadorned by the fleeting applause of social media. With a modest following of 4,000 on Instagram, I stand in defiance, treating the platform as the antithesis of genuine artistry, a silent testament to the authentic pursuit of photographic expression.

I been doing a lot more street than models and I have a lot more models going into the mid 30s age range and losing interest in doing further modelling. The end it seems is knocking on the door right at the time when I finally made peace with my photography journey.

The Leica CL, an exemplar of design and function, finds itself undermined by Leica’s pricing of its electronic lenses – a fate that may befall the Leica SL as well. The audacity to affix a price range congruent with the mechanically focused M lenses to electronically driven counterparts is a move fraught with overreach. The tangible brass and the tactile experience of mechanical focusing in the M lenses are qualities that entitle them to a price justified by their detachment from the shifty digital realm. In contrast, the electronic lenses’ connection to the digital age fails to warrant a similar investment, reflecting a disconnect between the intrinsic value of craftsmanship and the market’s willingness to embrace it.

I went to Fukukoka with the Leica CL and I visited Kyoto with 2 Leica CL. There is just perfection in the form when I pair them with manual focus lenses like those from TT Artisans.

Leica CL | TT Artisan 50 1.2 , TT Artisan 17 1.4 | Is photography dead | Should I quit?

The point is, I am still having fun. I reconcile the issues with editing and changing stuffs in Photoshop and the AI generative art to the same category. Truth have a way for forcing itself into our attention. I see lesser and lesser value in photos that are retouched and more and more value and beauty in images that I kept the “truth” intact, just tuning the WB, exposure and adding film simulation feel to them.

The images above are taken using Leica CL with 17 1.4 and 50 1.2. Seems like I found the sweet spot for portraits story telling by having both focal length. For moving subjects the Sony A7SIII nails everything with a 40 f2.5 lens. I still shun studio shooting as I have little to no interest in fake background.

What about street photography?

Currently I am just using Leica CL for them. I am leaning toward sticking to the 23 f2 autofocus summicron lens for street as things are changing so fast, its either zone focusing or autofocus. In my recent Kyoto trip I did try using manual focusing, it’s not hard but on the 3rd day I was clearly tired of manual focusing.

Whats Next?

We just need to shoot more and share more. We need to treat Instagram as a toy rather than a serious tool, the algorithm and visual size has caused more damaged to photography industry than anything else out there. It is clearly a platform just for influencers or those committed to feed the algorithm Gods with topics that some of us have no interest to sell our souls for.

I was digging up my old gears to clear or giveaway when I stumbled upon the Sigma Dp2. Boy did this camera bring so much joy to my journey that started it all. I wonder (GAS ghost creeping up)…how does the Quattro DP2 perform. Just like Leica, Sigma is one of those companies with balls of steel in coming up with unique proposition to cameras. Sigma community in dpreview is nothing but toxic, an utter disservice to new comers. Lets just keep historical grudges as things in the past, cherish the beautiful memories of using that tool.

Sigma DP2 | The first love

Goodbye Olympus OM-1 Camera?

I really wanted to love the Olympus OM-1. I bought a whole set of lenses to invigorate my venture back into M43. Baptized with the understanding of compact and mobility advantages, I was ready. I packed a few lenses and went to a trip to Langkawi, came back and sold off the whole set.

What went wrong, why? Surely a camera in 2023 is more than sufficient for any purpose today and Olympus as an “adventure” camera company would not disappoint.

olympus om-1 camera review
Olympus OM-1 with the 38 f1.8 Zuiko lens from the PEN-F film cameras era

I came home from langkawi and inspected the images I had taken during the trip and 25% of the images was out of focus. Perhaps it is the combination of the 15 1.7 Lumix lens and OM-1, a match not made in heaven. Tons of possibilities, none that I have time and will to investigate.

My observation is that the AF is perfect except in backlit situation which happens to be the sunset that I was using as the background. Olympus is such a beautiful name, such rich legacy in photography., such beautiful philosophy in believing in making everything compact, I would do it injustice to rant further on this. The lenses and OM-1 is now with the camera shop waiting for a much more deserving client than me.

When the AF is a hit, I have such rewarding images with so much soul, Adiue Olympus, thanks for the journey.

Olympus OM-1 with 15 1.7 Lumix

Why The A7SIII And OM-1 Is My Goto Camera For Portraits

sony A7SIII portraits
sony A7SIII Portrait
Sony A7S3, Voigtlander 35 f2.5 Color Skopar

After 7000 hours of doing portraits, I learnt a thing or two about doing portraits in natural lighting. I thought long about sharing my works with the public and the disappointing culture and algorithm on social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook is just going down the drain the longer you use it.

When is the last time you see a post that changes lives in Instagram? I barely recalled any, tiktok however is not only saving businesses from failing but playing a much bigger role in getting the average Joe’s and Alice’s content shown to the community. The algorithm in Instagram and facebook is designed to only milk you as a photographer more money to boost your post to an audience.

Now back to portraiture and the gears I am currently using. The Sony A7SIII or A7S3 while being touted as a video centric camera, scores in spades in an area that eluded the marketing geniuses in Sony. It has the ability to use vintage lenses and brings out their character without destroying the representation of the image created is second to none.

Sony A7S3 Stills Portrait
Sony A7S3, Voigtlander Color Skopar 35 f2.5

What do I mean by vintage lenses? Lenses that are created using the film era optical formula would produce a different results when its hit a sensor with high resolution pixels where the micro-lenses would introduce both colour shifting and smearing on anything but dead centre. The optical design were made for film plane that would take in the light regardless which angle it comes in. Those beautiful M mount lenses, have you ever wondered why the mirrorless lenses are so huge when compared to these? Modern mirrorless cameras are mostly an afterthought coming from the DSLR era and lenses are telecentric in design due to the mirror and distance of the sensor from the lenses. It is only lately we begin to see compact lenses re-designed for mirrorless (eg Sony 24,40,50 trio FE) and other players like Nikon’s small 26mm f2.8

Sony A7S3 portraits
Sony A7S3, 40 F2.5 FE

I can say all new premium priced lenses I have seen in the last 5-6 years are super clinical. Images are flat, clean and flare-less and I am not sure why did we arrived to such a list of criteria as being beneficial for photography. In the cinematography world where things are 10-100x more expensive, they are embracing the opposite. Lenses with flares and characters are welcomed while clinical ones are shunned. How did the stills photography community got so wrong.

If you are TLDR, I have some of the points covered in this video, lots of images are shared here and its 1/3 parts of a video I intend to share highlights of lessons learnt from 7000 hours of portraits since 2011.

The 12mp on the A7S3 is just beautiful. I rarely get any issues on using any film era cameras except the really really wide ones and even those, you don’t have a better choice. Throw in a techart LM-EA9 and you can beat Leica out of the park with autofocus for M-mount lenses and boy does it focus fast!

One of the lenses that I am in love with is the Voigtlander 35 F2.5 Color Skopar. It produces images with tones, colors and character that is just gorgeous. I hope this lens don’t get discontinued like the other Skopars, else I would have to buy a few just to ensure I can use them for a lifetime.

Now I am getting to the interesting part. I sold off my Hasselblad X1D II 50C and got myself an Olympus OM-1. I will probably share the reasons behind in another blog post but the short summary is that I have come to stage where “luxury” ownership brings little to the table. A camera needs to fit in either of the following category :

  1. Ability to perform, output matters
  2. Enjoyable experience

It doesn’t have to fit in both roles and in many ways, it don’t need to else you will be searching for the “perfect camera” that don’t exist. I am sure out there, there are commercial photographers and studios what would welcome the Hasselblad, but for my type of shooting where outdoor dynamics and candid plays a huge role, it’s weight/speed/satisfaction is better served by my Pentax 645Z (most underrated MF since existence).

What does the OM-1 brings to the table?
Let’s see, computation photography, super small lenses and the only phase detect M43? Yes of course, but in my hunt for great lenses, I needed a body that can host a lens that all the previous m43 bodies have failed to live up to its potential. The Nocticron.

Olympus OM-1 portraits

Olympus OM-1, Nocticron

Again, I know this sounds odd but yeah, my priority in choosing a body is rather dependent on the lenses I want rather than the body itself. Nocticron is the closest thing I have to the Leica Noctilux f1 (which have characters far beyond its 0.95 cousin) and it auto-focus. Visually the character it produced are similar though I don’t understand how a n 45mm with 14 elements ends up similar with a 50mm with 7 elements.

I have bought and sold off the Nocticron before and it is only when looking back at all the images I have done, almost like a dying person seeing flashback of his life, I begin to appreciate what a gem this was and how underrated it was. I won’t be surprised its sold at lost even at retail price given the sum of its traits.

The OM-1 brings superior low light focusing, face detection, subject detection and all kinds of features to a dream lens.

Camera OM-1 Portraits Nocticron
Olympus OM-1, Nocticron
Olympus OM-1 images portraits nocticron
Olympus OM-1, Nocticron
Olympus OM-1 images portraits nocticron
Olympus OM-1, Nocticron

Now, if you look at the Nocticron name itself, there is only one(1) lens in the world having that label. Neither Panasonic/Lumix nor Leica ever released another lens with that label. It comes with an extraordinary long lens hood and that got my curiosity piqued, was Pana-Leica trying to hide something? Sure it did and thank goodness for it.

Olympus OM-1, Nocticron

It has flares and boy is the flare beautiful. I don’t believe in Leica glow, but this is just surreal. The flare is soft, golden and sometimes cast a vintage “defect” to a clinical world.

Thanks for visiting my blog and I hope to share more images on my next series.

Olympus E-M10 Mark IV 2021 Review, taking a bow

Olympus e-m10 mark iv 2021 Review

E-M 10 Mark IV, what a confusing name convention for the lineup of cameras in Olympus. When Olympus sold off its imaging unit, I decided to read-up on its lineup and and models history, almost paying the company the last respect. Those reading led me to inquire for a unit of the latest E-M 10 Mark IV from a local shop in Kuala lumpur. There are two reasons for this :

a. Almost nobody took a deep look of the E-M 10 Mark IV in 2021 whether in blogs or in youtube. It is as people are just interested to get a copy of it during the launch, write something surface level about it and left it. There are no users that used it beyond the first few months?.

b. I am curious, if this was the last camera you know you will produce before your dept is sold off, what would you do. This angle of thought, a fun conjecture, would take hold of my thoughts and I concluded that it would be worth exploring with an actual unit. I do own a PEN-F, arguably the most beautiful Olympus digital camera albeit designed with a cheap plastic battery door. (The only other camera with such a contrasting build and even worse quality battery door is the Nikon CoolpixA)

IV the dreaded number in Chinese culture, aptly taken by Olympus

How was the camera? I must concur it is the most basic digital camera I have seen since the Leica TL. There are 3 large dials that controls the mode, the aperture / shutter and the mode. The body reminds me of the Olympus film cameras that was produced before digital took over but in a much better build and heft (yes, those film cameras like om-10, om-20, om-30 produced by cosinas are more similar to this camera than the venerable OM-1, but E-M10 Mark IV has a borderline assuring quality that makes you second guess its position of an entry level OMD)

Natural flare, Olympus e-m10 mark 4, 17 1.8
Masks in Cafe / E-M10 Mark IV, 42.5 Pana

Overall the camera size and weight is just beautiful. Something that you will bring out and replace your Iphone. Thats about the best line of argument you can use to justify buying such a camera. M43 doesn’t have the DOF creativity that FF grants you, inferior lowlight quality output and there are better options out there like the new Fujifilm XE4 that is also entry level and minimalism approach. Fujifilm however is a company that sells presets as upgrades and I totally abhor such direction.

The video on this camera is far better than those from the Sony A6400 in terms of rolling shutter effect and that moves it above the entry level value. Locally I noticed that Olympus gears are being dumped by many hobbyist as they freaked out on Olympus exit news and if you ever wanted camera you can bring anywhere and yet have the option to change lens without bringing out a gunny sack, this is the time.

Multiple Exposure is as easy as ABC / E-M10 Mark IV, 42.5 Panasonic
Stunning colors, Olympus e-m10 mark iv, 42.5 Panasonic

In my previous blogs, I have shared on my decision to downsize my gears count, stop reading reviews and pursue the count reduction approach. I have never met a person that has more items and stayed happy, but I have met many that have minimal or singular items and extremely happy with it. If you were happy with A, you would not have bought B or C for that matter. A simplistic view of our desire mapped by kindergarten maths.

I am now down to the revered D3, 645Z and this E-M 10 Mark IV. A distinct use for each of them. On a final note, the biggest con I found on this camera, is the focusing is still contrast based and the AF touch focus is too big to be of any use. Perhaps Olympus still has that stubborn echo chamber team in place.

Vanity, vanity. E-M 10 Mark IV.
Orange, Olympus e-m10 mark iv, 17 1.8

For some inspirational use and images taken by this camera, I found this flickr user to be exceptional. You can see his gallery of images taken on E-M10 Mark Iv.

Alpha 1 , the ultimate Sony Camera

Here is the best advice to anyone who has been searching for this and reached here.
It is a 10 frame per second with the mechanical shutter and 30 with the electronic shutter. If you are just a hobbyist, you don’t need this camera.

You don’t need this.

Now share this page if you got a friend suffering from GAS.

If you lose sleep over this, get it at B&H Photo.

Medium Format As The “One” perfect camera for hobbyist, feat 645Z and GFX50s

I must admit, I have been flirting with this idea for a very long time for my digital preferences. It has been around 2 months now ever since I started my One Camera One Lens restriction on using the film camera for a year. The idea is not entirely new as other people including the popular blogger Eric Kim advocated similar discipline.

You can check out some of the videos here, released on a weekly and bi-weekly interval, ads free and non-sponsored.

Covid-19 threw a big spanner on my plans as travelling even between district is now prohibited in Malaysia as part of the conditional movement restriction order. So with not much opportunity to finish up the 36 shots a week and while immensely enjoying the peace of mind with this approach I looked at my existing digital gears and wondered whats the point of keeping all the gears. If anything after a year, I am probably so sold on this restrictive approach that I wouldn’t ever need them.

medium format fujifilm GFX and Pentax 645Z portratis
Medium format 45 f2.8 / IG : sashaxuan / IG : changelivesimages

I took this discipline one step further and of today, I sold off my favourite EOS-R, Panasonic G9 and dozen of native lenses that worked on them. I kept the films few bodies that can work with exceptional lenses still in my dry box like the Otus 55 and several M mount lenses.

The result? A massive decluttering. Not only is the dry box having spare space, I realize all the spare items that was needed to support the existence of those items are not needed too. I ended up with 4 extra bags, 8 filters no longer needed (should have given it free with the lenses) and the same detoxifying effect on my mind.

I don’t need to think which camera to bring out when I need to shoot. When I need the film experience, 50F2 planar + Contarex. When I need the digital, BAM, here take this medium format camera and this lens.

Medium format 45 F2.8. I am a big fan of candid and realistic representation.

Photography, in terms of its role in our lives can be categorized into (3) three categories. You are either a professional photographers and makes a living in photography 100% (you would need whatever number of bodies and lenses needed for your job and this article would be moot), semi-commercial work of which you could de-clutter and like me, you could be someone who just enjoys photography passionately.

For us, hobbyists that enjoy photography and not so much about collecting gears, having a discipline of going out and producing amazing images while connecting with the community is the ultimate objective. It is what feed our addiction, shutter therapy and the sense of being part of something much bigger in purpose than the routine lives we see daily that are deeply driven by commercial motivation.

medium format fujfilm gfx for hobbyist
Medium format 45 F2.8. Beautiful gradation of a simple indoor scene of a hipster cafe in KL.

Now, here is the thing. I brought those lenses and gears to a contact of mine, Jeff Speaker and told him, “Here i am taking my 1 camera 1 lens further, take these and give me an evaluation” . Having a conversation with Jeff and the difficult situation the camera industry is in (Nikon Malaysia just closed its door), I am am prepared to a reasonable value and have no illusion about their worth being used. This means I would convert all these gears and lenses in my digital inventory into 1 Camera 1 lens.

Jeff came back with a trade in proposal instead. The big but in this trade-in scenario is that I was prepared to just use my existing Pentax 645Z as I still have 2 good lenses with it and it would be contradictory to my goal and direction to acquire more gears. The 645Z I had is the one tool that I would bring out when I need absolute quality and assurance in getting the images I want. I even brought it out to two overseas trip and no regrets on the weight. You can see some of my japan images, a friend I met-up in Tokyo and my wife in Khao Yai sunflowers farm.

Jeff’s proposal however make sense and I brooded over it for 2 days and agreed to it. He has a pristine used Fujifilm GFX50s and a 45mm F2.8 lens traded in by a customer for Leica or something. Bottom line, two bodies, dozen of lenses including some manual ones that I used with the EOS-R gone, a GFX + 45mm in. It dawned upon me, I am now left with just medium format cameras, the 645Z and the GFX50s and in a few months I might reduce them to One altogether when the 52 weeks is over or treat the other as a backup camera given that the sensor is the same Sony 50mp.

Would I have been happy having downsized to just the 645Z?, you bet. The GFX50s brings me closer to my current habit of packing 1 Cam 1 Lens and having no subscription to Photoshop I was eager to just use the Film simulation (cringe worthy but a lot of joy on the similar approach in my film camera experience)

fuji gfx medium format portrait
GFX50s 45 F2.8 – Classic Negative Simulation / IG : sashaxuan (Forbes 30 under 30)
medium format portraiture fujifilm gfx50s
GFX50s 45 F2.8 – Classic Negative Simulation / IG : missjoycelish

Look, I understand Medium format is expensive. I am totally advocating that anyone reading my blog here, if you have a decent camera since 2015, it is probably sufficient for all your use. The entire idea behind #jointherestriction is to move away from reading reviews of new camera gears, click baits in youtubes by influencers that peddles “this camera is the best camera yet”, instead go out and shoot. Spend on experience.

We are in the Era of disposable images and where lifecycle of digital cameras is just 1.5 years and that shiniest object you have in your hands that is worth 10k today is worth 2k tomorrow. Any investor would tell you, that is the worst investment ever. Buy used cameras for your upgrades and spend the extra funds on education, travel and props setup. If you are looking into Medium format digital, the 645D, 645Z and Fujifilm 50s is now available in the used market at prices lower than the latest Full Frame.

digital medium format photography using fujifilm gfx and 645z
GFX50s 45 F2.8 – Classic Negative Simulation, Realistic Skin Textures

Medium format totally works for me. If you are looking for reasons on settling for one, here are my reasons.

Depth Rendition

I love the tonality and quality it produces. The current sensor is just 0.79 bigger than the FF sensor but the results are significant. Images shot have better depth rendition, this is an overused term that can easily be explained. Just take a picture with your phone and at the largest aperture take a picture of say a cup. Notice the background blurring just 2-3 meters away compared to 10 meters are the same, the is absolutely no “transition” of depth between those distances. This is something IPhone’s fake rendition will never solve, neither will Huawai or any of those simulated depth regardless of who sold their soul and publish misleading youtubes on such features, they look absolutely fake and almost like a cut-out board.

Larger sensors allows much smoother transitions between distances. I am not referring to bokeh here but the depth rendition. This is also where i feel that plenty of test images you read on dpreview are totally missing the point by shooting on objects in similar focal plane.

digital medium format photography on gfx and 645z
GFX50s 45 F2.8 – Depth rendition

It is actually harder to produce high quality lenses for m43 like Olympus and Panasonic than to produce one for the Full Frame cameras. If you put in a FF lens into a m43 camera you will notice it does not produce the same excellent results you see on the FF camera when you pixel peep, unless the lens is of exceptional quality. This is why M43 system is at a huge disadvantage. They need to produce exceptionally high resolution resolving lenses while keeping the price low because consumers always compare them to FF. When you view mobile phone photos at 100%, you see the pixel quality are mostly junk but when you view m43 images, they look similar to those you see on FF, this is by no means an easy achievement by the m43 to appease the consumer’s expectations. You can check out the LPM measurements on micro four third lenses like those pro series, they often have to resolve “double” what is expected of a FF.

Now what has that got to do with Medium format? The opposite is true, you don’t really need a very high quality lens to fit the needs of the large sensor to produce very high image quality. The 645Z 75 F2.8 is crazy sharp and beautiful contrast yet it only cost USD 700, the results easily rivals a Summilux costing USD 7000 or more.

645Z 55mm 2.8 / ig : changelivesimages / sashaxuan

Image Pop Quality

This is an observable quality that is closely related to Depth rendition. Often we hear magical stories on how lenses produces images that just pops. Its pretty hilarious if you try to nail down the reasons behind them, personally I feel often it’s just the use of wide aperture and the contrasting colors between the subject and the background but some of my own images, I could not fit that narrative while still being awed by the results.

645z medium format portrait
645Z 55mm 2.8 / mandaa.cme
645z medium format portrait
645Z 55mm 2.8 / mandaa.cme

Ergonomics

As an asian, my hands are not as large as my western friends, but holding a medium format camera just works for me. The 645Z in particular has such wonderful grip and buttons placed perfectly that I don’t need to spend any time looking at menus. The Fujifilm GFX50s grip is superb and I love the simple physical buttons that I could find and use quickly. In a way I am a sucker for ergonomics, that is also the reason why my other 2 late cameras that I sold was the EOS-R and the G9, both are the best in its class for ergonomics in my opinion.

Bigger absolutely works for me, but not when it is as big as say a 67 Mamiya Rz or Pentax 67 both which i once owned and I felt had terrible ergonomics.

What if you don’t need a medium format camera?

I have done some of my best albums on both film and digital on FF and proud of some that I did on the m43. Did I mentioned I used to have tons of gears and been cutting down ever since until now. So you won’t miss anything, whatever you have now whether it is FF, m43, APSC, digital or film you could go out there and produce amazing images and you should be doing just that.